He's currently looking for approval at my company to see if he can
contribute the code to the community. Keep ya posted.

On 2/21/06, Cliff Zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also like to  know some detail about the InjectSpringBean annotation. Is it
> used in pages? Where is the place that your annotation get recognized. I
> created some annotation in my own EngineService. Did he modify the Page
> service?
>
> On 2/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Todd,
> >
> > So are you completely bypassing Hivemind at this point? I
> > wonder if this is a bug or intended behavior of Hivemind.
> >
> > I am not too familiar with annotations, if you can describe it in
> > a little more detail (or some code snippet) it would be *greatly*
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Todd Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Tapestry users <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:05:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: Tapestry + Spring question
> >
> > A coworker had the same problem. It seems that hivemind is also
> > caching or making singletons out of the beans returned from spring. My
> > coworker created a new annotation @InjectSpringBean that replaces the
> > @InjectObject("spring:linkSearch") type syntax. It pulls beans
> > directly out of the spring app context so that hivemind cannot get its
> > hands on teh resulting beans. This has worked very well so far.
> >
> > On 2/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I did mark the bean as a prototype (singleton=false) and I still get the
> > same behavior.
> > >
> > >  When I run this outside Tapestry (in a JUnit) then it worls fine...
> > when the singleton is marked true you get the same object back, when set to
> > false you get a new object back each time.
> > >
> > > So the question remains, why am I getting the same object back everytime
> > I call getLinkSearchCommand() even though it has singleton=false in spring
> > configuration.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: Tapestry users <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 4:36:18 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Tapestry + Spring question
> > >
> > > You can make the bean a "prototype"
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.springframework.org/docs/reference/beans.html#beans-factory-modes
> > >
> > > I believe Tapestry actually looks up the bean every time when you call
> > > getLinkSearchCommand().  Try that.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amir Sheibani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 5:49 PM
> > > To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > > Subject: Tapestry + Spring question
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a question on using Spring beans from tapestry pages. I am using
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/Tapestry4Spring to integrate,
> > and on
> > > my Tapestry page I have:
> > >
> > >     @InjectObject("spring:linkSearch")
> > >     public abstract ILinkSearch getLinkSearchCommand();
> > >
> > > In my Spring configuration file I have the bean set as a singleton:
> > >
> > >     <bean id="linkSearch"
> > >         class="LinkSearch"
> > >         singleton="false">
> > >         <constructor-arg>
> > >             <ref bean="accountSummaryDao" />
> > >         </constructor-arg>
> > >     </bean>
> > >
> > > The problem is that I need a new instance of this bean every time the
> > page
> > > gets loaded; however it seems that once a new instance is created, the
> > same
> > > one is returned every time the page is reloaded. I am not too familiar
> > with
> > > how Hivemind works... is this being cached by Hivemind?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Amir
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to