How cool! I love hivemind sometimes :)
On 2/10/06, Raphaël Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was able to use the Autocompleter component in portlet mode. The trick > is to set the tacos.AjaxDirect service to not use the infrastructure > LinkFactory but to use the servlet LinkFactory (the one used to generate > resource links like assets): > > <set-object property="linkFactory" > value="service:tapestry.url.LinkFactory"/> > instead of: > > <set-object property="linkFactory" > value="infrastructure:linkFactory"/> > > This works in both normal (servlet) mode and in portlet mode. > > I haven't tried any of the other tacos components. > > Raphael Jean > EntropySoft > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: vendredi 10 février 2006 02:26 > > To: Tapestry users > > Subject: Re: Tacos & Tapestry Portlets? > > > > Hi, I had done some similar tests a month ago. > > > > From Aj Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Is it true that you can't use Tacos AjaxDirectLink with portlets since > > > getAbsoluteURL isn't supported? > > > > Yes, that was the case. Three days ago I refactored AjaxDirectLink, > > and it no longer uses getAbsoluteURL. Will have to check which other > > components use it. > > > > > Is there a work around? > > > > Back then, i had tried patching tacos to use getURL instead of > > getAbsoluteURL. But then I came across the other problem: > > request.getHeader(...) is also unsupported in portlets, and it is > > currently needed by the AjaxDirectService. The headers are set > > in the incoming request by dojo (or perhaps tacos.js) - I do not know > > if theres another way to pass such info. > > > > Anyway, i commented out those lines (just to see what happens) > > and they run ok - but of course with no ajax functionality at all. > > The best I could get (with portlets and tacos) was having a > > javascript-disabled similar experience. > > > > PS. I ve added these details in an old bug report - bug6 or bug7 > > or something, but i cant find a link to it. And only bugs from 10 > > and on are shown on the bugtracker. Any way to get to those old > > entries? > > > > > > > > > > -Thanks > > > -Aj > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
