The reason you can't do this in the page file is that it would make
it impossible to have a meaningful DTD. Of course, you can do
essentially the same thing in your HTML:
<span jwcid="loop" source="ognl:someCollection>
Ultimately, Gregg is right: annotations are the wave of the future.
(Personally, I view .page and .jwc files as heading for deprecation,
though the Tapestry team might not agree.) And I do think there are
many things about Tapestry's annotation structure that could be
simplified -- so that's where simplification efforts should be
directed, IMO.
Cheers,
Paul
On Jan 15, 2006, at 8:15 AM, Martin Strand wrote:
How about using <component> attributes instead of the <binding>
element?
i.e. we would have
<component id="loop" type="For" source="ognl:someCollection"/>
instead of
<component id="loop" type="For">
<binding name="source" value="ognl:someCollection"/>
</component>
The old way would still work, but there would be a simplified
alternative. What do you think?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Piano music podcast: http://inthehands.com
Other interesting stuff: http://innig.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
