This is all a bunch of hot air. Howard is doing what he thinks he
needs to do in order to defend Tapestry interests. I'm sure he wasn't
talking down to anyone.


Geoff
On 1/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure Howard's email was meant for the few overly ambitious zealout type
> of users that will sometimes blindly fight or insight flaming in a way that
> makes tapestry look weird. (I'm sure I've personally done this a few times
> at one point or another in my life..)
>
> Is it really this important? Who cares.. Cut him a break, he did create this
> awesome framework for us :)
>
> On 1/10/06, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > These guidelines are nothing new. The essential principles are:
> >
> > 1) People respond to criticism negatively, however wrong they are and
> > however right you are. This is true of the person on death-row, the white
> > color criminal, the 80 year old grandma. Therefore, don't criticize.
> > 2) Never debate using empty superlatives. E.g. this framework is
> > faster/easier/nicer/ etc. This implies that you are making the judgment
> > for
> > others. Simply present what you like about your framework, just the raw
> > facts. If your readers aren't smart enough to deduce that your feature is
> > an
> > improvement over the other frameworks, then they aren't worth evangelizing
> > too!
> > 3) Everyone wants to hear real-world stories. Lots of framework ideas look
> > good on paper and fall apart in production.
> >
> >
> > That said, what's with the shipping with 50 components. I'd hardly call
> > the
> > form a component, even if it is built as a component. Do you seriously
> > think
> > a framework could exist without that? Its like an HTML editor software
> > claiming they support 50 HTML tags!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lindsay Steele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Tapestry users" <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: Tapestry 4.0 Release Notice on TheServerSide
> >
> >
> > >I think Howards email was great,  you take what you want out of it.
> > >
> > > I think everyone can agree that the more Tapestry flourishes, the better
> > > it is for it's users and the product itself.   Like many things,
> > > being a good product alone is not aways good enough to ensure reasonable
> > > popularity - good marketing is always helpful.
> > >
> > > The thing is,   unlike some other new frameworks,  Tapestry doesn't have
> > a
> > > big corporate entity that can throw all sorts
> > > of resources at it for marketing purposes.    To a certain extent
> > > marketing has to be done by the users and giving them
> > > a few friendly tips on how to market it better is not going to hurt.
> > >
> > > Good on Howard for giving people a heads up on news items, tips on good
> > > honest marketing and encouraging people to get the word out there.
> > >
> > > Francis Amanfo wrote:
> > >
> > >>Howard,
> > >>
> > >>This is really cheating! We are all grown ups and need no suggetions as
> > to
> > >>how we should compose our e-mails. We are not babies that need to be
> > spoon
> > >>fed.
> > >>
> > >>F
> > >>
> > >>On 1/9/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Please visit the article,
> > >>>http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=38407 , and
> > >>>show your support for Tapestry.
> > >>>
> > >>>Guidelines:
> > >>>
> > >>>No bashing of other frameworks.
> > >>>
> > >>>No flamewars. Be polite. Many will have closed minds and belligerant
> > >>>attitudes. They can not be saved from themselves, and will be first
> > >>>against the wall when the revolution comes.
> > >>>
> > >>>Simple is better.  Say something like "I just discoverred Tapestry
> > >>>after using StrutsWorkMVC and was amazed at how fast my productivity
> > >>>skyrocketted.  The fact that you can <insert favorite feature here> is
> > >>>simply amazing.  I highly recommend Tapestry."
> > >>>
> > >>>People will respond to anecodotes better than vague praise. For
> > >>>example "When you make mistakes, Tapestry does an amazing job of
> > >>>presenting the exception to you, with a flood of data about the
> > >>>request and session, and even a snippet from the template file
> > >>>highlighting the error."  This is better than "Tapestry error handling
> > >>>is better."
> > >>>
> > >>>If you use Tapestry or have ever benefitted from support on the user
> > >>>mailing list, this is your chance to take five minutes and pay back
> > >>>some of the effort the Tapestry team has invested in the community.
> > >>>Major releases are a chance to generate more excitement around
> > >>>Tapestry.
> > >>>
> > >>>--
> > >>>Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > >>>Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > >>>Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > >>>Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > >>>
> > >>>Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > >>>and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
> > >>>
> > >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>


--
The Spindle guy.           http://spindle.sf.net
Get help with Spindle:   
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user
Announcement Feed:    
http://www.jroller.com/rss/glongman?catname=/Announcements
Feature Updates:            http://spindle.sf.net/updates

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to