T 4.0 and T3.x are available and they do work on java 1.4. Why are you so concerned about future T version being java 5 dependent? That will happen to virtually all frameworks at some point in the future.
Jason Suplizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We don't have the flexibility to make a quick migration between JDK versions. As a result, mandating 1.5 might force us to completely reevaluate our framework decision. This is really unfortunate as I personally prefer 1.5 and love Tapestry. On 12/20/05, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > > With Tapestry 4.0 winding down, some of us are already looking forward > to Tapestry 4.1. > > Now, we would hope that 4.1 will not have as long a life cycle as 4.0, > which was 50% too long. I would hope for a final 4.1 by Q3 2006. > > One thing that I, personally, would like would be to start re-working > the APIs to make use of JDK 1.5 annotations and generics. Unlike the > add-one annotation support in Tapestry 4.0, this would MANDATE JDK 1.5 > for development and production. > > This is obviously a contentious issue, so I'm asking people to look > into their personal crystal ball and see what they and they're > organization will look like by next summer, in terms of JDK adoption. > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Konstantin Ignatyev PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000 Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New York: State University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206)
