I switched from IDEA when i changed jobs and didn't have a license
anymore , and it was then uncapable of dealing with jsp 2.0 . I spent
some 30 $ on my eclipse , got a special that included uml tools .

I am now considering going back to IDEA , since i don't even use jsp
anymore :) ( this is a tapestry ml afterall ) , and I know that I
could probably get it to do everyhing i need to with some smart
configuration . So far I've found nothing similar to the live
templates and the velocity generation that IDea does . It did however
bothered me that integration features are much slower to get done ,
especially when it comes to stuff like spring , hibernate or tapestry
... i mean evevn jsp 2.0 , took them a good year and a half - two
years to implement it after the spec came out .

I won't however , go back to IDEA before I get a new laptop , a 1.6
centrino with a 5600 rpm hd is definently NOT enough :) I might
however give it a try asap , to see theese js and refactoring tools
which you so highly speak off

On 12/16/05, Sergei Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's your Eclipse experience talking. :-)
>
> IDEA knows a lot in general and jsp 2.0 is particular. I'd pay $250 for
> its JavaScript knowledge and refactoring capabilities alone.
>
> S.
>
> Cosmin Bucur wrote:
> > does it know what jsp 2.0 is yet ? :)
> >
> > On 12/16/05, Sergei Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>By the way, for anyone considering switching from Eclipse:
> >>
> >>http://www.jetbrains.com/specials/j_specials.html
> >>
> >>This one is worth it.
> >>
> >>Serge.
> >>
> >>Cosmin Bucur wrote:
> >>
> >>>i use eclipse :)
> >>>
> >>>On 12/16/05, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>It has been beaten before, but I let me bring question of forum again.
> >>>>
> >>>>This is an quite interesting feature in the Hibernate forum:
> >>>>ranking answers and peole anwsering (based on number of useful answers 
> >>>>they gave).
> >>>>
> >>>>If it was possible to search among useful answers only, that would by 
> >>>>really sleek.
> >>>>
> >>>>I am wondering if we could migrate to such a forum and use the same 
> >>>>approach in Tapestry?
> >>>>
> >>>>Another feature that would be useful in such forum: find thread withoud 
> >>>>answers marked 'useful' - that might be wonderful tool that will allow 
> >>>>Tapestry experts to focus on 'hard' questions;
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>----- Original Message ----
> >>>>From: Frank Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>To: Tapestry users <tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>>>Sent: Fri Dec 16 20:51:35 2005
> >>>>Subject: RE: Learning Tapestry
> >>>>
> >>>>Yeah, but mostly with people looking for help, and not so much people
> >>>>helping.
> >>>>
> >>>>Notice how quiet the rest of the threads looking for real answers are...
> >>>>
> >>>>Frank Russo
> >>>>Senior Developer
> >>>>FX Alliance, LLC
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>From: Chris Chiappone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 3:43 PM
> >>>>>To: Tapestry users
> >>>>>Subject: Re: Learning Tapestry
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>At least it gives you proof of how active the mailing list is :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 12/16/05, Warren Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Wow, thanks to everyone for the information. I will take a look at
> >>>>>>http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDT/. As for the Eclipse vs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>whatever IDE
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>debate that my question started, I use Eclipse. It seems
> >>>>>
> >>>>>that a lot of
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>tutorials and books teach with Eclipse. If I were to write
> >>>>>
> >>>>>a Java book
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>or tutorial, I would go with the percentages and use
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Eclipse. I don't
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>think it is to hard to teach a beginner to set-up a minimal Eclipse
> >>>>>>environment in order to teach them something. Learning a
> >>>>>
> >>>>>little bit of
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Eclipse has not made it harder for myself to learn, but has made it
> >>>>>>much easier. Switch to whatever IDE when you are done.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks again for everyone's help. This has gotten me quite
> >>>>>
> >>>>>motivated
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>to take on Tapestry.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>From: Warren Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:34 PM
> >>>>>>>To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org
> >>>>>>>Subject: Learning Tapestry
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I am brand new to Tapestry and would like to know the best way to
> >>>>>>>learn it. I have gone threw the tutorials on this site
> >>>>>
> >>>>>for version 4
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>and have looked at some other tutorials on version 3. Version 4
> >>>>>>>seems to be much different than 3 and I am not sure which way I
> >>>>>>>should go. I have not found to much on
> >>>>>>>version 4 except for the users guide and it throws you
> >>>>>
> >>>>>right in the middle
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>of it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I am some what experienced in Struts and have played around with
> >>>>>>>JSF. Tapestry looks real interesting to me, but the
> >>>>>
> >>>>>learning curve
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>seems a bit steep. What would be the best way to get up to speed
> >>>>>>>with Tapestry? the
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>percet
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Thanks,g
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Warren Bell
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>-
> >>>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>__________ NOD32 1.1325 (20051215) Information __________
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >>>>>>>http://www.eset.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>~chris
> >>>>>
> >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to