Kevin Menard wrote: > Michal Hlavac wrote: > >> is this philosophy also good for tapestry4? > > Yes, you should be fine. I did have an issue setting a callback > property on a page instance however. Using an abstract setter method > and marking the field persistent fixed the issue.
what does it mean "should be"? is there some better way??? thanks, miso --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
