Alas, the code (for recognizing $bean) in beta-5 is broken. So this will have to wait for beta-6.
The an @Bean annotation, so yes, this will work with annotations as well. On 8/26/05, Denis Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I was just reading that thread. I really like the solution in beta-5. > Will it be possible to do that using annotations too? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kent Tong > Sent: sexta-feira, 26 de agosto de 2005 23:00 > To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: Validator question in Tapestry 4 > > Denis Souza <dsouza <at> sti.com.br> writes: > > > One validator in particular that I'm trying to port from Tapestry 3 won't > > work any more because it requires 3 parameters to be passed to it (one of > > which was an object, not necessarily a string). I can arrange to get the > > same result by doing form validation in a listener method, but it > certainly > > was cool to just pass along the needed parameters and not worry about it > > anymore. > > Please see Paul's workaround for this issue or Howard's solution to > appear in Tapestry 4 beta-5: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.tapestry.user/24904 > > -- > Author of an e-Book for learning Tapestry (http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDT) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
