Unable to enhance class
com.intaglio.webclient.site.CFolderList because it
implements a non-abstract read method for property
'currentMessage'.

If I am passing parameters don't I need an
AbstractComponent subclass.

Ed

--- Edward Scanzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can I still pass parameters. The way I am reading
> the
> documentation it says that Tapestry requires an
> AbstractComponent implementation to handle
> parameters.
> 
> Am I reading this wrong.
> 
> E
> 
> --- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Jun 10, 2005, at 3:45 PM, Edward Scanzano
> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a custom component with a complex .html
> > file
> > > and it accepts a parameter. I am not sure what I
> > am
> > > supposed to do in the renderComponent method. It
> > is
> > > empty right now and naturally nothing is getting
> > > rendered. I noticed in the Tapestry In Action
> book
> > > that Howard is rendering the output with the
> > writer
> > > object. I cannot do that since I have a template
> > > already. What do I do?
> > >
> > > What am I supposed to do in this method if I
> have
> > a
> > > template?
> > 
> > If you have a template and simply want to render
> it,
> > then subclass  
> > from BaseComponent and do _not_ override
> > renderComponent.  If you  
> > need to do rendering yourself, subclass from
> > AbstractComponent  
> > instead and implement the abstract method needed
> for
> > rendering.
> > 
> > I've never seen a case where you needed to have
> both
> > a template and  
> > do rendering in code manually.
> > 
> >      Erik
> > 
> > 
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to