Going too fast for me own good ... http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/current/UsersGuide/spec.html#spec.changes
is the specific details about renames and changes in the DTDs. The other URL http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/current/UsersGuide/upgrade.html Covers the wider view (i.e., what to change in your Java file). On 5/9/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gregg, > > I appreciate that you're steaming ahead into unchartered 4.0 alpha > territories, but ... > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/current/UsersGuide/upgrade.html > > There is documentation to describe exactly what's changed. > > On 5/9/05, Gregg D Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I do see the new attributes. But they don't make sense anymore. > > Example.... > > > > 3.0 way: > > <property-specification name="password" type="java.lang.String" > > persistent="no"/> > > > > 4.0 way? > > <property name="password" initial-value="" persist="no"/> > > > > I can only assume that initial-value is optional and I don't have to > > specify the type anymore? > > > > I would test it but I can't even get a simple hello app to work yet > > because I don't have a clear line of site on what all JAR's are needed > > now beyond the hivemind jars and the latest is I get an exception that > > it can't find the 4.0 DTD when parsing the .page files. Yes, I know I > > could still just use 3.0 but I'd like to help Howard et al by testing > > all the 4.0 specifics. > > > > Gregg > > > > > > On 5/9/05, Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gregg, if you're pointing at the new 4.0 DTD and you've got completion, > > > then you should be able to see the new valid attributes. Otherwise, have > > > a look into the DTD itself to get a quick overview of the changes to the > > > elements and attributes. > > > > > > Gregg D Bolinger wrote: > > > > Looks like things have changed in the .page files as well. > > > > <property-specification> is no longer valid. I looked at <property> > > > > but then type and persisistent attributes are not valid. What is used > > > > now? Are .page files still needed at all? > > > > > > > > Gregg > > > > > > > > On 5/9/05, Gregg D Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>The <property> element appears to no longer be valid in the > > > >>.application file. I was using it to specify my own Visit class. Is > > > >>there an element that has replaced this or it is done differently now. > > > >> > > > >>Gregg Bolinger > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
