Ah sorry maybe in that other order. The key point is to sort the stops and the ways separately and how tools can still route along the ordered ways.
________________________________ From: Jo <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:00:51 PM To: Alex Dawn <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations Where does it say that, because in most route relations I looked at the stops are first (preferably in the order they are passed) and then the ways in the order they are traversed. Polyglot On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:15 PM Alex Dawn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The PTv2 schema says to put all the route ways first in order, then the bus stops in order. Maybe you can do a similar thing here and sort the route ways first and then the sign points. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2020 9:04:11 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Removing all signposts from relations sent from a phone On 25. Jul 2020, at 20:33, Alberto Nogaro via talk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: So if you do so, information is indeed lost. +1 Otherwise I can’t see why should it difficult to data consumer to strip the unwanted information before processing the route. +1 Unless the script preserves the information by storing it by alternative means, I would regard such a script as vandalism. I agree and oppose this proposed automatic edit Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
