On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:32 PM Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/6/20 1:37 am, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Jun 12, 2020, 13:59 by [email protected]: >> > >> > > Changeset envelopes which span more than 100s of km² are broken. >> > > >> > Except cases where you edit/delete already created huge objects or you >> create >> > huge object that actually should be created. >> > >> >> These types of objects should be pretty exceptional. I try to split >> landuses to sub 1km² because i also feel the pain for >> rendering tiles. As soon as someone touches those areas you invalidate >> tons of tiles. So breaking this down also benefits us long term >> concerning workload on the tile servers. >> > > Not just that, but cadastral type tags probably shouldn't be spanning > large areas to start with. If your landuse or landcover polygon is > crossing an unclassified or higher highway, you're probably making a big > mistake. landuse=residential is NOT a substitute for place=neighborhood > (something I see a lot). > > > Hummm.. the following military areas are used as a rocket test firing > area. Spiting them up into 1 km square areas would be a lot of work! Total > area is approximately 122,188 km². >
Odds are that's a single parcel. Nobody's expecting that to get broken up. But when you have landuse=residential spanning entire city districts, or entire towns and crossing other landuses like retail, commericial, industrial, highway and railway, that's clearly a misuse.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
