May 13, 2020, 12:39 by [email protected]: > > > > Am 12.05.2020 um 23:03 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk: > >> >> >> >> May 12, 2020, 05:48 by >> [email protected]>> : >> >>>> >>>> >>> As Joseph said: >>> >>>> The attribution goes on the map. >>>> This is not a difficult requirement to meet. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> The most recent version of the guidelines >>>> drafted by the LWG is almost there, but has drawn community >>>> criticism >>>> about being too generous especially w.r.t. initially hidden >>>> attribution. >>>> >>> >>> Is there anywhere I can share my two cents about the guidelines? >>> >> I commented on >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Draft_Attribution_Guideline >> but I am unsure is it a good place because I got no reply. >> > > Expecting a reply is unreasonable, taking the comments in to account not > (which we did). > > Allowing to hide attribution on mobile remained present in this proposal and AFAIK it was one of primary reasons why Draft Attribution Guideline is staying as a draft for now rather than being adopted. (though I was participating in just some meetings on Mumble). And it deserves an explanation why not showing attribution is considered as ODBL compatible that requires to ensure that user is aware of data source and license. And, no, a typical user will not click on a hidden button or check deeply in settings. >> One may also join online meeting of a Legal Working Group >> and talk there. >> >> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group >> "The group now meets every 2nd Thursday of the month, at 20:00 UTC, >> on >> Mumble <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mumble>>> , unless >> rescheduled." >> > > As you know the LWG has handed the subject back to the board months ago, > not to mention that we provided ample time and venues to provide input > on the matter and that is long closed. Just because somebody wasn't > paying attention doesn't mean that you restart a process when they turn > up and feel they have a right to their opinion being heard*. > > > Simon > > > * that was one of the main reasons the OSM licence change was such a > traumatic experience. > > Well, in that case comments may be useful for next improved version or for a board. There may be a better place to post them, but I am not aware about anything better.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
