It's fair to point out that "no malicious vandalism or unintentional errors" is overdoing it, no one can claim 100% on this.
But "you don't really know what you're talking about" is a rude thing to say. And expressing a belief that FB is not capable of doing this to a small, or even large degree, is not based on any factual inquiry of what they've done. * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron On Tuesday, March 10, 2020, 04:06:05 PM EDT, Marc M. <[email protected]> wrote: Michal Migurski wrote > Only those edits which have been validated to contain no malicious vandalism > or unintentional errors so we can show them in our display maps I get the impression that you don't really know what you're talking about. There are many "complaints" that FB does not respond enought to community feedback. So to believe that FB is capable of validating even the slightest change is naive at best. I spend a lot of time checking every changeset in 2 comfort zones, I regularly detect anomalies, but to know if it is correct or not takes time. Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
