My proposal : survey > aerial imagery.
So its the aerial imagery mapper who has to check that its aerial imageries are more recent than the last changes made with survey sources. That’s something I do often when I see weird differences. (So we put the load on the big companies instead of the free local mappers ;) Regards. Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 11:14, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Fixing stuff in OSM purely from imagery may not be good. >> >> A local mapper who sees something may add it before any satellite imagery >> has it. >> >> If you then 'fix' this back to the satellite imagery you will have >> committed an error, >> and that error may dissuade our most important resource from ever making >> any further changes- the local mapper. >> >> Be very careful! >> > > I second this last line ! > > I am observing an influx of mixed-quality remote edits from Amazon > Logistics in my area. > I expect this Facebook operation to produce much more changes or potential > changes (=suspected errors). > What we need for both cases and similar ones in the future is a way of > being able to identify such changes, which by their nature will be > armchair-mapping efforts. > I do not have a specific proposal, but I would appreciate a tool that > helps me, as local mapper, find these edits, and, more importantly we need > a new approach to organise digesting these massive distributed > armchair-mapping interventions on OSM data. > I don't realistically think that banning these activities is good for OSM. > Not dealing in a systematic way with it at all presents, however, a big > risk of deteriorating the map for two reasons: > (1) bad armchair edits by Amazon and Facebook (and others) > (2) demotivating non-armchair mappers > > I repeat I do not have a proposal how to handle that. My main concern is > that the required work for locally checking even only those edits that need > checking (I am assuming that at least FB has good algorithms to sort out > the dead-certain corrections beforehand. I am more sceptical with Amazon's > changing local access tagging to, essentially, "yes" everywhere they have > delivered something by delivery van. I came across a good number of them, > and in most cases they were at least dubious) > > Volker > (Padova, Italy) > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Florimond Berthoux
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
