Am 19.02.2020 um 13:50 schrieb Frederik Ramm: > ... > I acknowledge Kathleen Lu's recent remark about the ODbL being very > clear on a derived product having to "contain" OSM in some way which > would not be the case here; but I think this calls for working on ODbL > 1.1 to rectify the issue, rather than sitting back and saying "uh, guess > there's nothing we can do then". > ...
IMHO the issue here is that we often, mistakenly, tend to treat "using" OSM the same as "creating a derivative of OSM data". As a thought experiment consider planning a trip around your fav place boundary with OSM, going for the walk with an OSM based map in your hand so that you stay on course, and then writing a a blog post about your experience. For the purpose of the argument forget about substantial vs. non-substantial and Produced Works vs. Derivative Databases. Is the blog post a derivative of OSM? Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
