It was a correct one - you were aware about it and learned about another one that may be more useful :)
Oct 9, 2020, 20:05 by [email protected]: > Ok, thank you for the guidance. I will forward to legal-talk, and I > apologize if this wasn't the correct mailing list. > > On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 15:44 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> AFAIK "makes no claim as to the usefulness, accuracy or completeness" >> is not a problem, whoever is doing imports must do this part anyway. >> >> But what is the license of the data? >> Maybe "Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency has no objections" >> is sufficient (I am not a lawyer) - but only if that agency holds >> full rights to the dataset >> >> As usual, legal-talk has greater chance to get response with someone >> with greater >> legal knowledge. >> >> Oct 9, 2020, 14:38 by [email protected]: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have been in contact with the Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning >> > Agency (SOCPA), an Onondaga County NY agency, about the licensing >> > of a >> > building footprint layer they have. My intention was to import this >> > layer after further review by the OSM community and myself. After >> > contacting the agency head about a possible waiver for OSM use ( >> > along >> > the lines of >> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Getting_permission#Letter_Template_1 >> > ), I received this response: >> > >> > The Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency has no objections to >> > geodata derived in part from the "Onondaga County Building >> > Footprints" >> > layer being incorporated into the OpenStreetMap project geodata >> > database and displayed publicly on the map. By using the data, >> > however, the OpenStreetMap project agrees that Onondaga County >> > makes no >> > claim as to the usefulness, accuracy or completeness of the >> > county's >> > building footprint file, and the county will not be held >> > responsible >> > for any omissions or inaccuracies. This data is provided as is and >> > there is no guarantee that it is suitable for any particular >> > purpose. >> > Your use of the data is at your own risk. >> > >> > Is this licensing favorable for use by the OSM community? >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Talk-us mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
