I think I got them all. The ones that had a name on the Tiger 2017 overlay at least. The ones that did not have a Tiger name (looks to be mostly service roads) I changed to “fixme=chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required”
Here is a search for those: /* This query looks for nodes, ways and relations with the given key/value combination. Choose your region and hit the Run button above! */ [out:xml]/*fixed by auto repair*/[timeout:25]; // gather results ( // query part for: “name=chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required” node["fixme"="chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required"](31.259769987394286,-116.56494140625001,37.309014074275915,-108.06152343749999); way["fixme"="chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required"](31.259769987394286,-116.56494140625001,37.309014074275915,-108.06152343749999); relation["fixme"="chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required"](31.259769987394286,-116.56494140625001,37.309014074275915,-108.06152343749999); ); // print results out meta;/*fixed by auto repair*/ >; out meta qt;/*fixed by auto repair*/ > On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:28 PM, Greg Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 10, 2017 8:13 AM, "Tod Fitch" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have started trying to clean up some of the redactions in Arizona, starting > with the town of Maricopa. As Ian pointed out, these were “pre-redacted” and > rather than deleting the road name, the name was changed to > chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required. > > I did not see that the redaction was finished. I will work on any of the > remaining names. The chdr changes were focused on various new subdivisions at > time of the changes. > > > The problem is there are some roads that do not have names on the Tiger 2017 > overlay. At this time I have left those untouched. > > My worry is that there does not seem to be a lot of local mappers working in > the area so it may be a while before the remaining > name=chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required roads get fixed. In the meantime data > consumers will be giving confusing information to end users. I can see (or > mentally hear) lots of routing guidance with “turn right at churdr usa az > name fixup required”. > > I am inclined to simply delete the name if Tiger 2017 has no name. That will > do two things: 1. Make the map and routing less wrong. And 2. Allow the > normal QA tools we have indicate an issue (residential road with no name). > > Thoughts? > > Tod > > > On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Ian McEwen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > AZ has none because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51502902 > > rather than an actual absence of things to fix from this (that changeset > > essentially pre-redacted the names, so they no longor appear in > > Frederick's list of redactions). I've fixed those I could find in the > > Tucson & Pima County areas, but there's still lots to be gone over in > > AZ. > > > > Just mentioning this so if anyone's doing anything like tasking manager > > work, they'll know they need to special-case AZ. > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:21:59AM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote: > >> FYI, > >> > >> No redactions in Oregon, Arizona or Utah. I’ve added Tiger 2017 names to > >> the ways in the list located in California and Nevada. Later today I’ll do > >> New Mexico and Colorado. > >> > >> I’ve got to restrain myself from correcting geometry, adding surface, > >> lanes, turn lanes, etc. while I do this. :) > >> > >> Tod > >> > >>> On Oct 9, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Looks like there are about 6600 redactions in the US. Did a quick sort of > >>> the list by country and state and it looks like Texas has the most (by > >>> eyeing the list rather than counting). Most states have a very manageable > >>> number. There were about 42 in California and I was able to apply Tiger > >>> 2017 names to 38 of those. Most states will be that easy. > >>> > >>> All I did was take the list, extract out the ones for California, do a > >>> edit to add "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/“ in front of the way ID > >>> and then do a “Load Location” in JOSM for each. Looked at them with the > >>> Tiger 2017 overlay imagery to see if there was a name I could apply. Took > >>> maybe 1/2 hour to do all of California. > >>> > >>> Not sure this is a big enough job to bother putting up a OSM task for it. > >>> Just grab the way IDs in your state, and maybe in your neighboring > >>> state(s), and do it. > >>> > >>> Texas and maybe New York will require more work, so maybe those could be > >>> broken into tasks. But for the rest I think it would pretty much be “one > >>> state is one task”. > >>> > >>>> On Oct 8, 2017, at 3:28 AM, Nick Hocking <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Can someone put up an OSM task so that we can replace these names , from > >>>> Tiger 2017? > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Talk-us mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Talk-us mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-us mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-us mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
