> A simpler explanation would be that women are simply interested in other
> past-times. And what's wrong with that?
*On average* women are simply interested in other past-times. And what's
wrong with that?
--- groan that I have to put that caveat in, or people will twist your
words.
On 05/09/17 14:32, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
The ultimate goal for OSM should be a project which everyone feels
welcome to be a part of, and which does not have a noticeable bias
towards either gender or any given race. Also, please realize just
because women are welcome to participate in OSM, does not necessarily
mean that some women will *feel* they are welcome.
But exactly how is the project unwelcoming? How could the "Edit" button
be welcoming to men and not women?
I didn't even know the map had strip-clubs or childcare in it - and I've
been contributing for 10-years, so this clearly isn't an explanation for
the gender percentages we have.
A simpler explanation would be that women are simply interested in other
past-times. And what's wrong with that?
Joel
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
