On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote:
> Without wanting to reawaken the argument, I think Pierre's wiki text was a > little injudicious and I can see why Grant removed it. Writing a "local > community guideline" instructing people to reply to an OSMF working group > with a cut-and-paste response is never going to help us reach agreement: > it's just institutionalising conflict. Hello Richard, The origin of this cut-and-paste response comes from reports on this list indicating that the DWG didn't stop the cut-and-paste requests asking a separate account. Even though the last discussion on the main list showed some possible compromises and solutions. I also say clearly in the wiki that we should use this predefined message "en attendant la résolution du conflit avec le DWG". If the cut-and-paste requests stop, then the cut-and-paste responses will stop too. Pieren _______________________________________________ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
