Bon finalement ce serait plutôt annulé. voici un résumé/traduction du message de nickb :
Il s'excuse pour les personnes ayant attendu la réunion ce soir. Les personnes intéressés par le projet sont appelés à venir faire des commentaires sur le wiki : <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters> Reprise des débats le 18 septembre pour créer un deuxième brouillon du contrat entre les local chapters et la fondation. A partir de cette date les associations en place pourront signer le contrat. Les termes exact du contrat signé seront ensuite négociés entre le futur local chapter et la fondation afin de s'adapter aux spécificités régionales. Il y aurai également en cours la création d'une mailing list dédié aux local chapters Et le message original : Hi Kate + group, There's been a bit of confusion around Local Chapters meetings - I tried to sort out the confusion last week, but clearly did not do a very good job ;-) Sorry if you guys wasted your time today. A lot of the community felt that the best way forward for Local Chapters would be to make comments based on the proposed Local Chapters agreement on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters Anyone who is interested in Local Chapters should add comments to the proposed agreement. The aim is to find all there areas where there are disagreements and then try and solve them one by one. What I've suggested before is: "What I propose is that we set a date of the 18th September (4 weeks away) in which we as a group of people interested in Local Chapters can discuss and debate the way forward and then deliver a second draft of the agreement(s) that will allow those Local Chapters who are ready to go to sign up and get going. In the meantime, we'll mainly focus on textual commenting. If we need phone calls, we can arrange them as needed." The good news, especially for the patient and keen Locals like Ivan, is that the OSM-F board agreed last Saturday that we could go ahead and start to form local chapters based on a provisional agreement. The board felt - and I hope this is reflected by the community - that having one master agreement for all local chapters would not work and that the role of the Local Chapters group should be to negotiate an agreement with each local chapter that takes into account local specifics (like how hard it is to set up a non-profit in the USA or why Dutch groups can't have members and so on). Of course, some things will need to be the same for each agreement. Local Chapters will have to be democratic, have a mission statement that falls in line with that of the OSM-F, and so on. We also talked about membership fees. I really like the idea of using a PPP index ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_power_parity) to set a variable rate membership as a way to help inclusiveness. The next question of course, is who's chairing the Local Chapters working group. I was previously the chair, and the OSM-F board have previously agreed that only board members can chair working groups. So the group is chair-less. I'm happy to continue as interim chairman or whatever. AFAIK, Mike Collinson is in the process of setting up a Local Chapters mailing list, which should make communication easier. -- Vincent MEURISSE _______________________________________________ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
