On Monday 15 June 2009 11:04:35 am Valerie-Emma Leroux wrote: > Pour une présentation d'OSM demain, je cherche depuis quelques jours des > infos sur la licence ODbL. Voici les dernières info que j'ai trouvé :
Le texte de la dernière version : <http://www.opendatacommons.org/2009/04/29/open-database-license-odbl-v10- release-candidate-available/> Extrait d'un discution sur la ML légale : From: Henk Hoff <o...@toffehoff.nl> Date: 06/06/09 02:54 am >> With 0.9, we identified the problem of "produced works" not being >> releasable under CC-BY-SA (or any other share-alike license, say >> GFDL or >> even GPL where included in software) because of the reverse >> engineering >> clause which collides with the "no restrictions may be added" clause >> in >> these share-alike licenses. I think that most of us were quite clear >> that this would be a total show stopper, and several suggestions were >> made to overcome the problem. >> >> Can someone explain how this has been resolved? > >The LWG has mentioned this issue with ODC. There will be an RC2 of the >ODbL in which this problem is solved. The change will be: > >1. Add something on produced work/derivative db question along lines of: > >"Any derivative Database used in the creation of a Publicly Available >Produced Work should be considered itself as Publicly Available and >therefore subject to Section 4.4." (where Section 4.4 is the Share >Alike clause) > >2. Remove the reverse engineering clause. Pour les allergiques à l'anglais: - le texte de la RC1 est disponible - Il y a actuellement un bug qui fait que les travaux dérivés ne peuvent pas être sous licence CC. La correction est prévue pour la RC2. Comme je lit la ML légale en diagonale, il manque surement des précisions. -- Vincent MEURISSE _______________________________________________ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
