Thanks Andrew! You're obviously right across things, so will leave them in your capable hands!
Thanks Graeme On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 11:46, Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Just an update.... Based on information I have been given the bridge > construction status remains unclear. > > The bridge is not currently open to the public. Emergency/ADF vehicles are > using the bridge. > > If the bridge does open to the general public, the approach/departure > angles of the temporary bridge will restrict access to suitable/specific > vehicles only. > > Given this and the dynamic nature and limitations of the bridge at this > time, we have left highway=destroyed unchanged this morning. > > Kind regards, > Andrew Hughes > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 15:10, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I was saying that as soon as it was reported that the bridge was down! >> >> Townsville is only ~80k down the road, with quite a number of Engineers, >> & also Armoured units who have their own mobile bridges! >> >> You'd think they would have been there before the day was out? >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme >> >> >> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 14:27, Phil Wyatt <p...@wyatt-family.com> wrote: >> >>> It will probably be a Bailey Bridge (or two?) in the interim so >>> Graeme’s suggestions are a good start >>> >>> >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailey_bridge >>> >>> >>> >>> alternating one way will likely have lights at each end so maybe >>> highway=traffic_signals >>> >>> traffic_signals:countdown=yes? >>> >>> >>> >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals >>> >>> >>> >>> It will be interesting to see how fast they can get this in! Maybe an >>> opening_date tag as well when known. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers – Phil >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, 6 February 2025 2:06 PM >>> *To:* Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> >>> *Cc:* OSM Australian Talk List <talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >>> *Subject:* Re: [talk-au] Q: Bruce Highway Temporary Structure tagging >>> >>> >>> >>> First things I would think are maxweight= (when known) & hgv=no? >>> >>> >>> >>> Oh, & one-way alternating, however that's put? >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> Graeme >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 11:18, Andrew Hughes <ahhug...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> >>> UPDATE: The federal Govt have announce a plan to reconnect the Bruce >>> Highway (destroyed bridge here: >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666801953) with a temporary, single >>> lane structure (unsuitable for hvg).. see >>> https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/media-releases/2025-02-05/temporary-structure-reconnect-flood-impacted-communities-bruce >>> >>> >>> >>> I would like to know if anyone has any advice (in advance) on what >>> tagging conventions might exist for this temporary structure? Granted we >>> need more information, this is simply taking advantage of the time window >>> we have to make any possible progress. >>> >>> >>> >>> Many thanks in advance. >>> >>> Andrew Hughes >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
