Oct 17, 2023, 11:49 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > > > > On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> Presently, it's common for route relations to have names that violate >> "name is only the name" and "name is not ref" and "name is not >> description" rules for name=* tags. >> > > > > > I don't find it common in 'my area' of mapping. One or two examples > would demonstrate the situation? > > See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Use_description_instead_of_name_for_route_relations#Examples name=Tram 64 (nocny): Bronowice Małe => Os. Piastów from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3171712 is an example this tram line has no name "Tram" is additionally wrong as not matching local language and "nocny" part) useful label could be made from ref=* from=* to=* tags and there is no need at all for this fake name. Note that info that it is a night tram is not provided in any structured form, only as part of the fake name. This fake name should be removed and info that it is a night tram put into some tag or into description=*
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
