On 03/05/2023 08:28, Marc_marc wrote:
I don't see how an algo will detect that 2 objects
amenity=charging_station represent 2 sites on the same parking
(and are therefore valid in the new schema) and not 2 charging
stations on the same site (which would have to be changed to
man_made=charging_station).
Agreed - i tried to explain the problem at
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/charging-stations-sites-or-individual-chargers/96810/198
. That resulted in this change
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal%3AEV_Charging_Station_Mapping&type=revision&diff=2504680&oldid=2498183
, but beyond that communication didn't really occur (the people
promoting the proposal thought that there wasn't a problem).
It's less of an issue here than it might me with other proposals because
the infrastructure being mapped is getting expanded rapidly, so the "old
ones already mapped" will be a small, shrinking subset of the total.
What might become an issue is that I doubt that the paradigm chosen here
that mirrors existing petrol / diesel infrastructure actually matches
what we will end up with - I suspect that we'll get "almost every
parking space has a charge point" instead, although that's obviously
some way off currently.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
