The simpliest way to map a long route is to give the same name to every ways it is composed of. Then, in second position, you can also create a relation. Regards, Yves
Le 29 décembre 2022 10:47:44 GMT+01:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : >Hi, > >It appears that route name are being applied to track/path names, > >I believe this comes about due to signs that state the route names and point >along the track/path that appear to the name of the track/path. > >For example Way 228853104 >https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228853104#map=15/37.8558/-107.3617 > >Tagged as; > >name Continental Divide NST {NST being an abbreviation of National Scenic >Trail} >name_1 Colorado Trail (Segment 22) > >and part of relations; > > > Relation Colorado Trail (3445384) > Relation CDT ivc (8053592) {this is an abbreviation of Continental Divide >Trail and part of a relation, that is part of a relation, that is part of >Relation: Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (921198)!!!} > >I think the 'names' should be removed from these 'unnamed' things ..the 'name' >is the name of the route not the individual tracks/paths some of which existed >before some routes were created. > >Note I am not that familiar with the above 2 routes but am familiar with two >near me .. and those routes are relatively recent compared to the tracks and >paths they use. I am useing those 2 routes as more people would be aware of >them than the ones I know. > > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
