Hello, about a year ago I implemented support for site relations in OpenCampingMap.
My announcement from back then is at: https://blog.geggus.net/2021/09/announcing-support-for-site-relations-in-opencampingmap/ Now a recent changeset discussion is questioning my whole approach because it arguably violates the "One feature, one OSM element principle": https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126035627 Ignoring the principle (which is not absolute anyway) in this case and adding a relation of type=site + tourism=camp_site containing the actual tourism=camp_site object as a member does solve the problem thus I would go for doing just this as I did a year ago. Obviously others seem to differ here. Currently the above changeset breaks my map regarding those campsites where the tourism=camp_site tag has been removed from the site relation. External features are no longer shown :( So how to resolve this problem? campsites with external features (e.g. sanitary facilities used by a campsite and a sport-center) do exist in the wild and they usually do also have on-the-ground objects (way, node, polygon-relation) where no other tag than tourism=camp_site does make sense. What do you think? Sven _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
