On 24/10/22 07:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Oct 22, 2022, 15:09 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
sent from a phone
On 22 Oct 2022, at 12:47, Anne-Karoline Distel
<annekadis...@web.de> wrote:
Following the rejection of the crannog proposal with the
concern about
the hierarchy above the proposed tag, I now propose to change
the key
from site_type to archaeological_type
such a retagging would be a waste of time, I would not pursue this
idea, and given the high majority that is required nowadays it is
also unlikely to succeed.
You could just continue mapping the settlement sites and crannogs
as you please and have a wonderful time, document the tags, speak
about it so that other people interested in mapping this kind of
feature can join you. :-)
personally it seems to me that it has chance of being a good idea
+1
It can coexist with past tags ...
Migration can then proceed;
A mechanical edit can be done to add the new tags. (normal approval
process)
After some time of use, the older tags can be removed .. (normal
approval process)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
