Am Mi., 12. Okt. 2022 um 20:00 Uhr schrieb Evan Carroll <m...@evancarroll.com >:
> > This is all 100% new to me. Where is it documented that a "shop" in a > detached house should be mapped as a detached house, and not a shop? > please do not try to create confusion bvy shortening things. There are 2 entities to be mapped: a building and a shop. The building has its own tags, refering to the building, and the value of the key "building" is about its architectural type. As an architect I can tell you that there is not just one kind of "building type", it depends on the classification system which type a building is seen as, but that in general there are building types, from an architectural point of view, is not under discussion. The kind of types we are discerning can be found in the wiki, and you are also encouraged to introduce different types as you see missing. > Where is the notion of "architectural origins" documented. > it is an interpretation / result of the typology classification. It means that a building that was constructed with a certain typology, keeps being in this "box" unless it get transformed to a different type of building. Personally, as long as you can recognize the original building type, I tend to use this for the building value. > I thought we could treat the wiki as authoritative and everything else not > in the wiki as a wrong or mistaken, or unsupported? > we don't do this. We treat the wiki as descriptive and the data base as authoritative, as long as it isn't an error, in this case we fix it ;-) Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
