Oct 12, 2022, 16:23 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Le 12.10.22 à 13:15, Sebastian Martin Dicke a écrit : > >> If there is an aircraft standing on an airstrip which has been >> decommissioned yesterday (or thirty minutes ago), is it considered properly >> to tag them as historic=aircraft? >> > > I think it depends on the history of the object : > > if the last Concorde [1] had been treated in this way, I think > it would have been possible to consider it as historical from the > first minute of its immobilisation, a page of history is turned > after years of supersonic commercial flight, it is history. > > On the other hand, a single aircraft with no history other than "we don't > need it anymore" is not historic, neither now nor in 10 years, > it is at best a decoration > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concorde > note that in actual mapping any such decommissioned vehicle gets historic=vehicle (or historic=tank or similar)
Yes, that goes contrary to theoretical definition of historic=* key desired by some. And it does not really seem incorrect to tag all old tanks as historic=* (the same goes for locomotives, planes and so on). If someone really dislikes it they can start using/promoting https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=vehicle or maybe https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=tank <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=tank#chronology> (and cleanup cases where it was used for man_made=storage_tank) or maybe other tag. Or accept current tagging as survivable.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
