I could have just gone and used it and not made a proposal, but I don't
feel very comfortable making videos about tags that are just "in use"
(mostly by me) and not approved. It's a risky strategy, but I hope it'll
pay off for this one, because there are at least two videos in it. it
also delays the video production by at least four weeks into the rainy
season...
But I would also like to re-tag the ringforts from fortification_type to
settlement_type, because they are not military. That's for the next
proposal, though.
Anne
On 22/09/2022 20:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 22 Sep 2022, at 18:06, Anne-Karoline Distel <annekadis...@web.de>
wrote:
Following that swiftly with a new proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crannog
at first I thought that’s quite a specific value for such an
apparently generic term like settlement type, but likely it will be
easier to get specific settlement types, e.g. from information boards
on site, as it will be to come to a global level of generalized types.
Many of the specific types are probably occurring only within regions
and smaller areas, and this is part of why it’s interesting, and there
the specific type is what you’d want to know.
I’d support the tag although probably not use this specific value :)
Cheers Martin
PS: following wikidata I came to a redirect in the 19th century
encyclopedia, a printed redirect, funny how such concepts have been
there already for a long time:
https://de.m.wikisource.org/wiki/MKL1888:Crannoges
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
