A sacscale isn't a thing, it's an assigned category. The same category includes different situations, none of which is necessarily actually present, you only know that at least one is there but not which one. So, if a path has a sac_scale which may or may not include a scramble section somewhere, sac_scale simply does not indicate scramble, let alone where it is, how long it is and other niceties.
If you split the way from just before the scramble section to just after, and tag only this section with appropriate sac_scale value and other attributes fitting for a scramble, that is a better indication, but it still does not say it's a scramble. Peter Elderson > Op 15 sep. 2022 om 20:53 heeft Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> het volgende > geschreven: > > > čet, 15. ruj 2022. 19:57 Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> je napisao: >> I know, but the scale does not indicate specific things you encounter, just >> that somewhere along the way you will be challenged. > > > That isn't true. If you tag a relation with sac_scale, then it is as you say. > But if you tag a way with sac_scale, then this says "this sac_scale is > exactly here, along this whole way". > > Janko > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging