On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 05:40, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm giving away all my favourite spots here but both of these the stream > is mapped a a way, and has the pool under the waterfall mapped as an area, > so you can determine pools under a waterfall based on the natural=water > area with one of the nodes being a waterway=waterfall node. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531128566 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32173325 > > If we want a separate tag for this that's fine, but currently people use > the water=stream_pool in OSM to tag these. > Until water=stream_pool came along, these would have been mapped as water=pond, or even left as natural=water without defining the type of water. I expect many still are mapped that way, even today. Do we need to differentiate between stream pools and plunge pools given that so many of both are already mapped as ponds? I can see arguments both ways and don't (yet) have strong feelings either way. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
