On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 1:56 PM Anders Torger <and...@torger.se> wrote:
> Do you think there is a valid use for fuzzy areas in outdoor/rural areas, > or would you rather see them not being used there either? > I've mentioned before that I, at least, have fuzzy administrative boundaries to deal with. https://caltopo.com/map.html#ll=43.9281,-74.49657&z=14&b=t shows an example of a political boundary where even the USGS topo has the callout, 'INDEFINITE BOUNDARY' - and an error of closure indicated at the north corner of Arietta township! (It's not just an error in aligning the map sheets. Note that the contour lines and water bodies align perfectly. The old surveys simply don't line up. Nobody cares enough to put up the substantial expense that it would take to resolve the question.) In the hamlet of Oxbow, the residents do care what township they inhabit (and pay taxes to), so the town line is surveyed and monumented in the little strip at https://caltopo.com/map.html#ll=43.43904,-74.48374&z=15&b=t . Most of the rest is pretty, uhm, approximate. Historical fact: Gore Mountain https://caltopo.com/map.html#ll=43.67821,-74.03996&z=14&b=t was so named because it fell in the 'gore' created by the fact that the old land grant lines failed to close, and hence didn't belong to any township. In that case, nobody cared for decades, until Barton discovered garnets on its north slope. A protracted legal battle ensued over which town had the right to tax the mines, which was eventually resolved by resurveying the old lines and creating the new town of Johnsburg in the gap. That's just how we address these questions here in the US; ignore them until someone's willing to pay to find out the answer. The answer to 'what county contains the cluster of houses on Kings Flow ( https://caltopo.com/map.html#ll=43.68781,-74.22956&z=15&b=t)?' is obvious: Hamilton County. The answer to "which county contains the summit of Chimney Mountain?" is "who wants to know?" Topology matters. You can't answer an 'inside/outside' query without a closed region. Whatever solution we arrive at, it ought to allow an implementor to resolve a question like, "in what county is the village of Indian Lake?" (Hamilton, despite its indefiite boundary!) or "Is Port Sudan a port on the Red Sea?" If it cannot represent the fuzzy world to the point where that sort of question can be answered, it is an incomplete solution. Nobody familiar with the places would have the slightest trouble answering those questions. I'm really reluctant to say that the solution must be to foist the problem off on an external database. All geodata are approximate. To say that anything with imprecision doesn't belong in OSM is to open the door to endless haggling over how good the survey must be before data meet OSM's standards. Is that the path we want to take? -- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
