On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 23:55, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1) Holiday cottages are rarely building=cabin, they are mostly > building=house. >
May depend on where you are? I know of a number of places that advertise cottages / cabins eg http://lyrebirdspringbrook.com/index.html One around the corner from me is a former house > that has been converted to a holiday let. Even the ones on farms > are converted stone barns, converted stone stables, etc. > Shouldn't they then stay as their original type of building? From the buildings page: the value may be used to classify the type of building. Note that it may be not the same as the building's current use (tagged using building:use <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use>=*). For example, a hospital building that is abandoned or repurposed to be a marketplace is still a building=hospital <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhospital> > 2) A farm which has converted some of its buildings to > holiday cottages will have a mix of building types. Mappers > who wish to go into details would prefer to see the > individual holiday cottages rendered distinctly (as > they currently are). > But building=yes + name=xxx will still render sufficiently, won't it? 3) This scheme has problems with individual holiiday > cottages, such as the one around the corner from me, > unless you retain tourism=chalet for such cases. > Individual as 1 cabin per site, or, as Mateusz raised, multiple cabins on one site? 4) There are a lot of tourism=chalet. Are you proposing we bulk edit them? > Nope! Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
