It seems to be proposing also belisha_beacon=yes that is now unused https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=belisha_beacon%3Dyes
At the same time it has "However, in countries like the UK, where belisha beacons are used, every single zebra crossing has belisha beacons installed, so there is no need to tag them" There is also "Indicates the presence of a "belisha beacon" at the crossing. (Most likely unnecessary, discuss below)" Given there is no indication that it would be useful or needed I think that it should be not proposed. If that it would be useful or needed it can be proposed separately. Note that having two proposals in one will result in people voting against if there are against any of them, so splitting would be a good idea anyway. Dec 13, 2020, 20:25 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority#Tagging> > > Here is my first proposal for a tag to describe pedestrian crossings where > the pedestrian has right of way over all vehicles on the road from the moment > they have indicated their intent to cross. I created this because > "crossing=zebra" or "crossing=marked" aren't clear enough. Please read the > proposal for more details. > > Thanks, > IpswichMapper >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
