On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 8:34 AM Jan Michel <j...@mueschelsoft.de> wrote:
> On 12.12.20 14:25, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Jan Michel > > <j...@mueschelsoft.de > > <mailto:j...@mueschelsoft.de>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > where do you see a problem here? The current situation might not be > > perfect, but it is usable as it is. The only thing to keep in mind is > > that the number of "lanes" does not need to match the number of > entries > > in the "XY:lanes" tags. > > > > > > That disagrees with literally every lane editing and validation tool in > > existence at this time. > > Please check for example this way: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406235586 > > It perfectly validates in all tools I tried - JOSM, OSMI, Keepright... > Rendering in the lane attribute style in JOSM is fine as well. > > Even the examples in the Wiki show exactly this: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles > > It was mentioned in the original proposal for the :lanes suffix 8 years > ago. > > So, it *agrees* "with literally every lane editing and validation tool > in existence" as well as documentation. > Sure, if you manually torque tag it to match the incorrect documentation. As soon as you open the lane editor, it rightly corrects it to lanes=5, since you have 2 lanes in one way and 3 in the other.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
