Hi Volker, this looks like a valid solution to me. Slight additions/corrections:
don't use "lanes=2" as this is for fully fledged carrigeways. Also, you might want to use: bicycle:lanes=no|designated foot:lanes=designated|no and maybe add a general "overall" tag surface=paved Yours Hubert87 Am 23.11.2020 um 15:39 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
How do I correctly tag this way: OSM way 434742113 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434742113>, Mapillary image <https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/WA2lBoDF91ISfRY983d4wf> It's a segregated bidirectional foot-cycleway: highway=path bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=yes onewy=no Its overall width is width=4 It's illuminated lit=yes Its surface is ok: smoothness=good I want to indicate the relative position of foot and cycle lanes: lanes=2 bicycle:lanes=no|yes foot:lanes=yes|no I'm tempted to extend this approach to the surface and width as well: surface:lanes=asphalt|fine_gravel width:lanes=1.5|2.5 Is this tagging correct? Are there (better) alternatives? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
