Nov 22, 2020, 19:00 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > I'm surprised you think that as you were a contributor to the discussions: > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3102 > This is a closed, not implemented PR. So it is not a case of "OSM-carto demanding boundaries on ways". > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-March/035347.html > Yes, long time ago there was a problematic idea that was abandoned. Describing something like that over two years later as "OSM-carto demanding boundaries on ways" - in present tense and with claim that it is technical issue caused by incompetent programmers is misleading at best.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
