Am Fr., 20. Nov. 2020 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>:
> This seems unlikely, with 0 lanes it would mean that cars inside are > blocked > and unable to leave. > that's not the meaning of "lanes", lanes=0 would mean that there are no traffic lanes. (this is what the wiki says about "lanes"). > I even mentioned two variants of "two parking lanes": > - two parking lanes on road, one driveable lane, no road markings - I > would tag as lanes=1 > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Barton_St_view_E_between_South_Park_Rd_and_Brown_St,_Macclesfield.jpg > ) > parking "lanes" are not counting as "lanes", because parked vehicles are not "traffic". I agree for your example that I would tag this as lanes=1 as well. > And illegal de-facto parking is problematic in general > yes, maybe we should rather tag the police station as corrupt or lazy or both, than focussing on all the problematic, tolerated, illegal parking ;-) IMHO these are 2 lanes, clearly marked on the ground. I do not see a reason > for one lane to be seen as parking lane only. > > Even if it is both de facto pernament parking lane and parking in this way > is legal? > as long as cars do not have to stop in order to pass each other, yes. I agree the width of the road is restricted, but if opposite traffic can continuously pass, it is 2 lanes according to the current wiki ("how many traffic lanes there are on a highway.") Another question that comes to mind, now that we have removed the requirement for road markings. In a situation where 3 lanes are marked, but vehicles ignore the marked lanes and actually drive in 4 lanes, would you tag this as 3 or 4 lanes? Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
