Hi André, That's an interesting question. Power transformers can have rating=* to state how many power they can transmit. I see no problem to add it to a power relation like the one involving the line you mention https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8193755#map=11/50.7528/6.0606
Can you explain the difference between your value (7.5 GW) and the value already visible on the relation (1 GW) please? Difference between rating on a power=line/cable and rating on a power relation is a follow: - On a line/cable, it's the maximum capacity the line/cable is designed for - On a relation, it's the rating the whole link is operating at Power circuits relations : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_routing_proposal All the best François Le dim. 15 nov. 2020 à 16:45, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > A group of friends were discussing the first electricity power link > between Germany and Belgium. > And I was kinda proud to show them this > <http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnHBvd8SSPWzEusSeb3IgxYvFjXI9Y2FibGXFiMKdCiovCltvdXQ6anNvbl1bdGltZcWmxagyNV07Ci8vxI_ElMSdxZRyZXN1bHRzCigKICDFuyBxdcSSxJrEo3J0IGbFkzogxYjFisWMxY7FkG7FnsKAxaDGi25vZGVbIsWWxJIiPSLGn2UiXSh7e2LEqnh9fSnFucaLd2F5xqnGq3LGrcavxZHGssa0xrbGuMa6xrzGiiDGgWzElGnFrMeCxp3HhMauxrDHiMa1xrdvxrnGu8a9xozFvMaPxpHFlcSwxpXGl3LGmcabx4PFmcWbxZ3Fn8eOxqXGp8eVxZfHhcWaxZzGscazx5vHi8efx47Gv8eBxqrHlse2x67HuceJx5zHnseNxovHkMeSx5TIgce1xq7Ht8Wdx5rHisedx4zFuceNxo1wxLduxpXGgcaDxoXGh8W0xJjGpnnFuT7Fuciic2tlxL1xdDs&c=BMQ-MfkYtJ&R> > where the only line across the border > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578137663> clearly shows. > Well done, guys (and gals?)! > > Way 578137663 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578137663> Tags 7 > > - cables=1 > - circuits=1 > - frequency=0 > - location=underground > - name=Alegro Interconnector > - power=cable > - voltage=320000 > > Their concern was interstate power transfers and a maximum of 7,5 GW was > mentioned (more than the 6 GW Belgian deprecated nuclear capacity, > effectively running at 4,5 GW). > So then I was surprised that a power cable or line does not indicate that > power. > I looked trough the wiki and all I found as power was an unsuitable > generator:rating:... > So, as power:power=* seems weird, I added *power:maximum=7.5 GW*, > allowing for power:mean=* or he like. > As I don't want to get into propositions, I let specialists discuss that. > Let me know if and how I should change that tag. > > Envoyé de mon immobile Thunderbird, et *sans virus* non plus grâce à > seulement Ubuntu, > > All the best, > > André. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
