On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 21:35, bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Surely you could always refine tagging according to your needs (like > with dog:species=Rottweiler).
No, I wasn't talking about the species, but about the "level" of sound heard. A blind person can't tell if that's a Rottweiler, German Shepherd, Pit Bull or anything else, just that it has a deep WOOF, while the other dog has a sharp, shrill yap, yap, yap. So you'd need to somehow account for level / depth of sound. So my question is still of a mapping ethics nature: would we be doing > any harm if we mapped whether a given private home has visible or > audible guard animals? (Sirens and other security measures aren't that > interesting from an ear-mapping perspective) > No, personally, I don't think we should map that a private home has any type of security, be it electronic or animal. Mapping to say there's a dog here would be OK though. Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
