That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as 
including
places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good (examples 
may include water fountains setup and maintained by city).


Sep 6, 2020, 20:39 by [email protected]:

> if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer Paul‘s 
> suggestion:
> drinking_water:legal=unsigned>   
>
> +1
>
> I also agree that this is a good suggestion 
>
> On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 20:34, Martin Koppenhoefer <> [email protected]> > 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>  
>>  > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>> 
>> [email protected]>> > wrote:
>>  > 
>>  > I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown
>>  
>>  
>>  if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer 
>> Paul‘s suggestion: 
>>  drinking_water:legal=unsigned
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  >> [email protected]
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to