On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 11:11, Jake Edmonds via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Doesn’t bridge:structure refer to the design of the supports? A canopy > walkway could use of mix of simple-suspension, beam and others not > currently explained in the wiki (I.e some sort of attachment to trees) > Yes, according to the wiki, this is the general configuration of the structural members. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:structure There seems to be some overlap with the values of the bridge key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge > Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone > > On 22 Aug 2020, at 11:36, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would say the feature is a kind of highway. > The construction is bridge, so bridge=yes on the highway. > The highway is a footway, and this kind of footway is called a canopy > walkway. > > The footway part is kind of redundant, which is probably nice if you > render all footways, but unnecessary when you render canopy_walkways > specifically. > > > Best Peter Elderson > > > Op za 22 aug. 2020 om 11:16 schreef Jake Edmonds via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > >> Should the key be bridge? >> I feel like canopy walkways are more like bridges than boardwalks. >> >> Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone >> >> On 22 Aug 2020, at 11:08, Alan Mackie <aamac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 21:46 Martin Koppenhoefer, <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> sent from a phone >>> >>> > On 21. Aug 2020, at 22:25, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > "public building" and "trunk highway" are also common terms. >>> > >>> > Do we tag >>> > >>> > building=public_building >>> > >>> > or >>> > >>> > highway=trunk_hghway >>> >>> >>> these are different because it would be a literal repetition. What we do >>> is footway=sidewalk rather than „side“ >>> >>> If general opinion is towards footway=canopy I could live with it, but >>> my preference goes to canopy_walkway >>> I’m not expecting so many that the extra characters will be significant >>> ;-) >>> >> >> I have had to remind myself several times as this thread has developed >> that this is not intended as a synonym for breezeway or other covered=yes >> footways. >> >> If the previously suggested =treetop isn't accurate perhaps a more >> explicit =forest_canopy ? >> >> >>> Cheers Martin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
