Thanks for sharing. I have no intention of contacting the user in question. It was just an illustrative example.
I don't know why this was posted to the tagging list. I intend to keep this discussion on the talk list so please respond there to keep the discussion together. Cj Malone <me-osm-tagg...@keepawayfromfire.co.uk> skrev: (22 augusti 2020 10:51:10 CEST) >On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 09:32 +0200, pangoSE wrote: >> Building upon it can lead to strange things. E.g. >> >https://www.nyteknik.se/popularteknik/mystisk-jatteskrapa-dok-upp-i-flygsimulator-6999771 >> (building:levels=212 was entered erroneously and committed to the >> database without any kind of QA follow-up. If someone knows the >> osmid I would like to know how long this error was present in OSM) > >https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712475718/history > >1 - It was introduced by a novice mapper, presumably as a typeo. > >2 - Nikolas von Randow fixed it about 9 months later, presumably with >some kind of QA tool (maybe just a overpass query). > >3 - Another local novice mapper also edited it, and fixed another issue >at the same time. Presumably noticed via a rendered map. > > >Before criticising the mapper, it should be noted that it was a novice >mapper and the existing building data in the area isn't of great >quality anyway. This wasn't a regression. And accidents happen anyway, >I've done a similar thing via StreetComplete where I entered the house >number in the building levels quest. > >The big companies doing QA on OSM data (Mapbox and Facebook) have a >high focus on vandalism. They are trying to stop "Jewtropolis" from >ever happening again. > > > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
