On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 15:29 Jmapb <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...Regardless, if this general approach is considered valid and > workable, then I'd like to propose the following answer to my original > question: > > * Q) How should `addr:street` be tagged for an address along an > unnamed way which is part of a numbered road-type route relation? > * A) Check the way for alternative name tags. The official postal > version of the street name may be tagged as `official_name`; if so > that's a good value for `addr:street`. If the way has other name tags -- > such as `alt_name`, `local_name`, `old_name`, or a language-specific > name -- those values may be used. It's also possible to use the value of > the way's `ref` tag, which should match the name of the route relation.
Name is only the name, so most route relations wouldn't have a name. Since the number of different variations on how one might address something when the street name is on a numbered route, seems like it's on the data consumer to fuzzy match appropriately to match an imperfect hit.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
