On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 19:46, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 30. Jul 2020, at 00:03, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> wrote: >> The wiki has a raised kerb as any kerb greater than 3cm in height. Your >> definition of a regular kerb is one greater than or equal to 10cm > > when reading the term raised kerb I’d rather think about something like > 25-40cm, while 4 cm surely wouldn’t be considered “raised”
You have to consider the purpose of the tag. To a wheelchair user, there might not be a lot of practical difference between 25 and 10 cm, because both are impassable. > I agree that introducing regular kerbs would only make sense if the raised > kerb would change its definition (or be deprecated). > > eg this is pretty raised > http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/07/29/article-2380778-1B0CC26E000005DC-458_634x386.jpg I would suggest that's a low retaining wall --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
