On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:36 PM Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > As I see it, having bicycle=no imply permission to push a dismounted bicycle violates the principle of least surprise because it's inconsistent with other *=no access tags. I wouldn't presume I could push my car along a motor_vehicle=no way, or dismount my horse and lead it along a horse=no way. bicycle=no is a strict "no", it is just that it means "no bicycling" or "no bicycle riding." Perhaps it is unfortunate that for modes of transportation we picked nouns rather than verbs (e.g. foot vs. walking), but that is what it is by long tradition. A similar thing applies to horse=no. There are roads (some of the US Interstates) where you can not ride your horse, but you can load your horse into a trailer, hook the trailer up to your truck, and drive with your horse on those same roads.
I suggest that if what is prohibited is pushing the bicycle, then we make an explicit tag for that bicycle_pushing=no. The same with regards to carrying the bicycle. If possession is prohibited all together, then bicycle_possession=no. Mike
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
