Re: [Tagging] Is there any case of valid numeric addr:housename - for example addr:housename?

[Florian Lohoff]

Hi *

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:16:38PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 30. Jun 2020, at 15:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging 
> > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Is there some chance that any of them is valid?
> 
> 
> IMHO not, these are likely autocompletion bloopers. I’d support an
> automatic retagging effort to addr:housenumber (unless there is
> already a different housenumber)

I had a quick look as addr:housename around where i feel interested
and 99% are broken. Most of the time it belongs into name as its
the companys name, sometimes its abused as replacement for ref
of buildings. Sometimes its just a duplication of some other
tags content.

And most of the time you find that you'll find even more tag abuse 
and random invented tags. In my case they were mostly 8+ years old.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f...@zz.de
        UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging