> I think if any I would use disused=yes as they still remain „operational“ I guess, although not actually used. > The disused:key=value style seems more appropriate for functions (amenity etc.) than for physical descriptions (man_made).
+1 I agree with mapping these as man_made=milk_churn_stand and adding disused=yes when this is known, since a used vs disused stone or concrete stand will look exactly the same. As mentioned by Paul, if there is a rotten wooden stand which is falling apart, that could be "abandoned=yes" since it couldn't be used without major remodeling / repairs. – Joseph Eisenberg On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:08 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 20. Jun 2020, at 14:44, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > They should probably have disused=yes or a disused lifecycle > > prefix (cue endless arguments about which) except in parts of the world > > where they actually are still in use (if they are). > > I think if any I would use disused=yes as they still remain „operational“ > I guess, although not actually used. > The disused:key=value style seems more appropriate for functions (amenity > etc.) than for physical descriptions (man_made). > > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
